What are the scandals really about?
Fannie Mae (FNM) scandal and the recent AIG scandal all are similar in
its nature: the company managements wanted to hide truth from public
or investors.
Here is what happened to FNM or AIG in a short illustration. The
CEO of a big financial was unhappy with financial statement,say short
of earnings. As we know, the CEOs' compensation largely comes from stock
options, which are largely related to stock price performance. In
order to artificially boost the earning and therefore to make big money,
the unethical CEOs made derivative transactions to do that.
The company would pay a special entity or third party certain
amount, say 100 million, plus 5 million fee for the derivative service,
and then the third party would pay back 100 million to the company in
return. The trick here was the money received (100 million) was
considered earning in the quarterly report, and the money company paid
out (105 million) would not be considered as cost. The 105 million paid
out would either dissappear in the balance sheet (special entity), or
it will be in liability part of balance sheet as reserve or other
liability.
In reality, the company paid 105 million, received 100 million, the
company lost 5 million. But in earning report, the company would report
100 million fake earning to deceive investors!
Of course, sometimes the manipulation was time manipulation. For
example, in the above example, the derivative could be structured in a
way that company make 100 million income today, and company will lose
105 million in next 10 years. Therefore, the cost of 105 is deferred to
future time and the earning is immediately booked.
You want to hear positive 100 million earning today? No problem with
this derivative. You want to hear negative 10 million loss this Q? No
problem, go with that derivative, the same company can be losing money
this Q.
In essence, with derivative, a financial company can report whatever
earning it wants today! But in the end, 5 million extra cost was
slapped at shareholders' face plus an artificial high stock price to
boost CEOs' bonus and pocket.
Derivative is huge risk for value investors
Take JP Morgan (JPM) as one example. This company is involved in all kinds of
financial business: real estate, commodities, future and options,
investment banking.
When I looked at its annual report, I can not figure out how much money
JPM truly made or lost each year. JPM reported 4.4 billion net income
in 2004, but do we really know how much JPM made in 2004?
Avoid financial stocks with
complicated books
Webmasters and Ezine
Publishers:
Free professional
content - pre-licensed to you..
You are invited to use any or all of
these value investing articles in your publication or website.
The only requirement is the inclusion of the following, after each
article...
* Article by
Henry Lu of BlastInvest LLC, a premium investment newsletter publisher
in Connecticut. Visit http://www.BlastInvest.com
for FREE "how-to" investing assistance, web services and more.