Shorting Strategy and Value Investing
Henry Lu
09/27/2005
How does shorting work?
Shorting strategy has been
very
popular since the bubble burst of technology stocks in 2000. Shorting a
stock is simply a bet that the stock price will drop.
An investor can sell a stock he/she does not own by borrowing shares
from brokers. The investor can sell the stock first and then buy back
the shares at later time. The investor can make profit if the stock
price he/she sells is higher than the price he or she buy back later
on.
Shorting Strategy for Value Investors?
At appearance, shorting strategy should
work well with most value
investors.
The core task of value investing is to calculate the intrinsic value
or the worth of a stock in order to identify bargain stocks that are
trading
at discount to their intrinsic values. If a successful value
investor can buy cheap stocks based on their intrinsic value, why not
just short a over-priced stock? In the end, method for
calculation of
intrinsic value is same whether the stock is overpriced or underpriced.
However, if you read carefully the value investing books from Benjamin
Graham, the
father of
value investing, you can find very little information
on shorting. We also know that Warren Buffett himself does not
utilize
shorting method. So why is shorting strategy not used by 2 greatest
value investors in history?
Shorting Requires Higher Degree of Diversification
Mutual funds are known to have extremely diversified portfolio of
hundreds to thousands of stocks.
Many successful value investors invest into concentrated stock
portfolio with adequate diversification. In the book
Intelligent
Investor Chapter 5 titled "the Defensive Investor and Common
Stocks",
Benjamin Graham preached "adequate diversification" of 10 to 30 stocks,
but not "excessive diversification". Warren Buffett was also known
to
invest into portfolio of less than 20 - 30 stocks for his hedge fund in
earlier years and for his firm Berkshire Hathaway. Charles T.
Munger, the second man of Berkshire Hathaway, and a great billionaire
value investor himself, was also known to make even more concentrated
bet than Warren Buffett when he was alone managing his own hedge fund
before he joined
Berkshire
Hathaway. My past investment performance in Blast Investor
Real-time Plus newsletter was also obtained with concentrated portfolio
of around 10 stocks
as well.
However, this kind of concentrated portfolio common in value investing world would
not have adequate diversification with shorting strategy. To illustrate this point, I put
following 2 hypothetical cases for comparing a typical long-only value
investing portfolio and a short-and-long combined portfolio.
Case 1 - Long Only Value Investing Portfolio
Table 1- Portfolio
1, Long Only Portfolio
Stock
|
Long or Short
|
$ USD for stock
position
|
1
|
long
|
$
10,000
|
2
|
long |
$
10,000
|
3
|
long |
$
10,000
|
4
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
5
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
6
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
7
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
8
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
A
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
B
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
Total Equity
|
|
$100,000
|
Table 1 is
fully invested
hypothetical portfolio with 10 stocks. All the 10 stocks are long
position of bargain value stocks. Suppose for the 2 years, 1 to 8
stock price stayed flat with no gain and no loss, and stock A and B
each
lost 90% of their value in the first year, and then not only regained
all the losses in the second year and actually doubled from the
original entry price. Table 2 is performance of portfolio 1 for
this 2 years:
Table 2 - Performance of
Portfolio 1
Stock
|
Initial
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
A
|
$
10,000
|
$1,000
|
$
20,000
|
B
|
$
10,000
|
$1,000
|
$
20,000
|
Portfolio
1
|
$100,000
|
$82,000
|
$120,000
|
Portfolio
1 Performance
|
|
-18%
|
46,34%
|
90% of loss in 2 of 10 stocks in portfolio did not kill the 2 year
overall performance of portfolio 1. In fact, Portfolio 1
still enjoyed overall 20% gain over the 2 years.
Case 2 - Long and Short Portfolio
Table 3- Portfolio
2: Long 8 Stocks, Short 2 Stocks
Stock
|
Long or Short
|
$ USD for stock
position
|
1
|
long |
$
10,000
|
2
|
long |
$
10,000
|
3
|
long |
$
10,000
|
4
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
5
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
6
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
7
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
8
|
long |
$ 10,000 |
X
|
short
|
$ 10,000 |
Y
|
short
|
$ 10,000 |
Total Equity
|
|
$100,000
|
Table 3 is
fully invested
hypothetical portfolio with 10 stocks. All 8 stocks (stock 1 to stock
8)
are same long
position of bargain value stocks, and Stock X and Stock Y are short
positions. Suppose for the 2 years, 1 to 8
stock price stayed flat with no gain and no loss, and stock price X and
Y each increased 10 times in the first year, and then not only lost
all the gains in the second year and actually further crashed and cut
in half from the
original entry price. Table 4 is performance of portfolio 2 for
this 2 years:
Table 4 - Performance of
Portfolio 2
Stock
|
Initial Equity
|
Year 1 Equity
|
Year 2 Equity
|
X
short position
|
$
10,000
|
-$90,000
|
$
15,000
|
Y
short position
|
$
10,000
|
-$90,000
|
$
15,000
|
Portfolio
2
|
$100,000
|
$ 0
(wipe out)
|
$ 0
(wipe out)
|
Portfolio
2 Performance
|
|
-100%
|
-100%
|
Although the investor
correctly predicted that stock price of X and Y would drop in 2 years,
the first
year rise of 10 times in stock price of X and Y triggered margin call
in portfolio 2. The 2 short positions of X and Y wiped out the whole
portfolio
2 so that the portfolio never had a chance to profit in the second year
of dramatic crash of X and Y stock price.
Market Timing and Money Management
Although the above -90%
loss and 10 times rise hypothetical cases are not common, this
kind of wild ride in stock market did happen. A stock
price change from $1 to $10 or from $10 to $1 was even less rare in
small cap or micro cap market.
A prudent investor certainly can not rule out such possibility in
portfolio management. Long term oriented value investing with 10 stocks
can
certainly withstand this kind of losses in case 1. However, the same
kind of change would not have chance of surviving for shorting strategy
as shown
in case 2.
To avoid wipe out with short strategy, investor has 2
choices:
- Investor either has to have a more diversified portfolio,
possibly with hundreds or thousands of stocks just like a typical
diversified
mutual fund portfolio.
- or Investor would engage in short term trading or market
timing so that the investor can short at or near top to avoid wipe out
risk.
Neither of above 2 choices are attractive for a truly successful value
investor. First of all, concentrated bet without excessive
diversification is one of key reasons for high performance. With
hundreds or thousands of stocks under management, a portfolio
with short strategy would be as mundane as a typical mutual fund
portfolio in terms of performance. Second of all, value investing
method is price oriented long term investing method, which by itself is
at odds with any market timing or short term trading strategy.
Certainly, there are successful investors utilizing short strategy in
stock
market. However, here is my final 2 cents:
Great
value investors such as Warren Buffett and Ben Graham do not short, you
don't need to either.
Webmasters and Ezine
Publishers:
Free professional
content - pre-licensed to you..
You are invited to use any or all of
these value investing articles in your publication or website.
The only requirement is the inclusion of the following, after each
article...
* Article by
Henry Lu of BlastInvest LLC, a premium investment newsletter publisher
in Connecticut. Visit http://www.BlastInvest.com
for FREE "how-to" investing assistance, web services and more.