BlastInvest.com!
Blast Investor
Real-time Plus
by
Henry Lu
SOHU
Outlook
Sohu just
reported 2004 Q2 earning report. What is my current outlook on SOHU
from investor point of view?
SOHU business can be broken down into 2 categories: Internet ads and
wireless subscription. Since SINA is closest competitor to SOHU, I use
SINA as comparison to measure SOHU performance.
Internet Ads
SOHU SINA reported different numbers, SOHU report GAAP earning only
while SINA report Pro Forma earning. Since Ads margins are very
similar, Ads revenue is used for comparison.
Internet
Ads historical revenue in $ millions
|
02Q3 |
02Q4 |
03Q1 |
03Q2 |
03Q3 |
03Q4 |
04Q1 |
04Q2 |
04Q3(est) |
| SOHU |
3.7 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
6.8 |
8.7 |
9.5 |
11 |
13.4 |
15.8 |
| SINA |
6.5 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
9.5 |
11.4 |
12.9 |
13.1 |
15.5 |
18.3 |
The above table clearly shows that SOHU has been out-performing SINA in
internet ads business over past 2 years.
In revenue basis SOHU is lagging SINA only by 1 quarter while 2 years
ago the gap was 3 quarters.
Internet website popularity is leading indicator of Ads revenue
growth. SOHU web property now is most visited web portal in China
according to Alexa. Historically, SINA was the most visited web portal
and was famous for its popularity of news channel. According to
Chinalabs, SOHU news channel has more reach than SINA news in recent
month. The trend is in favor of SOHU to surpass SINA in internet
ads revenue in the future.
Breakdown of ads gross profit in recent quarter number:
SOHU ads profit is 56% of total gross profit.
SINA ads profit is 30% of total gross profit.
SOHU generates more and more profit from internet ads while SINA
business is mainly in wireless business.
The success of SOHU Ads business is not just out-performing in
existing business such as news content but also in expansion into
new business such as search, gaming portal, localized sales
network with acquisition or more internal re-investment
spending. Specifically, the new search will be engine for
next phase of Ads growth in the near future. In comparison
, SINA has not focused that much in Ads business as SOHU did.
As I already said before, the main reason for investing into SOHU is
its internet portal ads business. The ads business has high barrier of
entry and has consumer monopoly power. Right now SOHU and SINA
have shared this new media monopoly in China. The have been
raising ads fees regularly over past years. This is very
stable business that long term investors can count on.
Wireless business
The outlook for wireless business is clearer from this Quarter.
SOHU reported lower revenue in wireless revenue , down sharply over
past quarter. 2.5G wireless business has been growing fast and
SMS business dropped fast. The SMS part is expected to bottom out
in next Q.
2.5G wireless revenue is 20% of total wireless revenue for
current quarter and will be 40-50% of total wireless business
next quarter. Since the 2.5 G wireless business is a growing
business , the risk of SMS trouble is much smaller from now
on.
SINA increased wireless revenue mainly due to
acquisition. In organic
growth, SINA is also expecting wireless revenue negative
sequential
growth for next quarter.
Wireless business in general is commodity-like business that is not
suitable for long term investment. For that matter,
Although I will value SOHU with multiple of 10 on the
wireless part of net income, the investment focus should be internet
ads business.
Dark horse - Game
Blade online has generated lots of users for beta testing.
Currently SOHU has 27 servers after 2 weeks of public testing.
For comparison Netease popular XYQ game had 58 servers after 1 month of
testing. The game momentum is very strong so that it is possible
to see huge upside from this game. If it is indeed as successful as XYQ
game to obtain 50k average con-current users or more, it will add 5
cents per share earning for SOHU in 2004 Q4.
Expense
SOHU increased expense a lot recently. However, SOHU spend extra dollar
mostly in new search, new game expansion, I do not view this as
problem. To evaluate this expense correctly, the expense usually
should be amortized into proper years. However since SOHU did not
provide detail and the amount is still not very big, I am
not too worried about this.
Further more, after new search launch next week and charging fee
for new game in Q4, the payoff of the extra will come soon.
For that matter, I will also want to look at next Q guidance in revenue
base rather than EPS earning base:
NEXT Q outlook
SOHU : 28.1-29.1 next quarter revenue is about 3%
to 6.6% increase over current Q.
SINA: 49.0 - 50 next quarter
revenue is about - 0.4% to 1.6% increase over current
Q.
SOHU is expected to out-perform SINA in net revenue growth next
Q. SOHU has smartly been focusing on more profitable internet ads
and online game business while SINA has spended money in acquiring and
growing wireless business.
Valuation
SOHU PE =
22
56% business in ads, 44% in wireless in terms of gross profit
SINA PE =
33
30% business in ads, 70% in wireless in terms of gross profit
SOHU: less commodity-like wireless business, more
high-growth profitable ads business, cheaper stock.
SINA: more commodity-like wireless
business, less high-growth profitable ads business, more
expensive stock.
Conclusion
I continue to like SOHU business outlook and its low valuation and huge
growth potential in Chinese exploding internet business.
I continue to hold the SOHU position in Blast Investor model portfolio.
Blast Investor Model
Portfolio Update
(as of 7/28/2004)
Blast
Investor Model
Portfolio - Performance
|
|
Portfolio inception date
|
12/31/2003
|
Portfolio inception value
|
$89,000
|
YTD Performance
|
13.4% |
S&P500 Index YTD Performance
|
-1.67% |
Blast
Investor
Model
Portfolio - Open Positions
| Symbol |
Last |
Shrs |
Value |
Paid |
Gain |
| ADGO.OB |
1.15 |
9,000 |
$10,350.00 |
0.78 |
$3,320.00 |
+47.23% |
| CHK |
15.01 |
1,100 |
$16,511.00 |
13.90 |
$1,211.00 |
+7.92% |
| HRB |
49.10 |
350 |
$17,185.00 |
54.00 |
-$1,725.00 |
-9.12% |
| LIBHA.PK |
4.00 |
1,200 |
$4,800.00 |
5.10 |
-$1,330.00 |
-21.70% |
| NEN |
70.40 |
300 |
$21,120.00 |
54.00 |
$4,910.00 |
+30.29% |
| NRG |
26.25 |
670 |
$17,587.50 |
23.05 |
$2,134.00 |
+13.81% |
| NTES |
35.61 |
350 |
$12,463.50 |
36.60 |
-$356.50 |
-2.78% |
| SOHU |
17.75 |
700 |
$12,425.00 |
24.882857 |
-$5,013.00 |
-28.75% |
| WLL |
23.24 |
350 |
$8,134.00 |
22.10 |
$389.00 |
+5.02% |
| $$CASH |
-19,649 |
-$19,649.00 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
$100,927.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Model Portfolio
Transactions
Date ![[Ascending]](http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/fi/up.gif) |
Type |
Symbol |
Shares |
Price |
Comm |
Amount |
Notes |
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Cash
In |
- |
-
|
-
|
-
|
89,000.00 |
Inception |
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
WRP |
700 |
18.30 |
10.00 |
12,820.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
HCA |
500 |
42.00 |
10.00 |
21,010.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
ADGO.OB |
22,000 |
0.78 |
10.00 |
17,170.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
LIBHA.PK |
1,200 |
5.10 |
10.00 |
6,130.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
SOHU |
500 |
28.60 |
10.00 |
14,310.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
NTES |
350 |
36.60 |
10.00 |
12,820.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
HRB |
350 |
54.00 |
10.00 |
18,910.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
NEN |
300 |
54.00 |
10.00 |
16,210.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
CHK |
1,100 |
13.90 |
10.00 |
15,300.00 |
-
|
| Jan
26, 2004 |
Sell |
WRP |
700 |
17.40 |
10.00 |
12,170.00 |
- 5% |
| Mar
5, 2004 |
Buy |
WLL |
350 |
22.10 |
10.00 |
7,745.00 |
-
|
| May
10, 2004 |
Buy |
SOHU |
200 |
15.59 |
10.00 |
3,128.00 |
-
|
| May
10, 2004 |
Sell |
HCA |
250 |
39.97 |
10.00 |
9,982.50 |
- 4.8% |
| May
24, 2004 |
Sell |
ADGO.OB |
13,000 |
1.55 |
10.00 |
20,140.00 |
+ 98.7% |
| Jun
17, 2004 |
Buy |
NRG |
670 |
23.05 |
10.00 |
15,453.50 |
-
|
| Jun
17, 2004 |
Sell |
HCA |
250 |
40.30 |
10.00 |
10,065.00 |
- 4% |