BlastInvest.com!
Blast Investor
Real-time Plus
by
Henry Lu
Efficient Market Hypothesis and NEN WLL
09/15/2004
Change of the newsletter
As you already know, the
Blast
Investor Real-time Plus newsletter will change into commercial
operation after September 17, 2004 so that this issue is the last free
public issue. After Friday, the newsletter will turn into closed
non-public Yahoo group and will require new sign up. Please pay
attention to our web site in this weekend for details of signup, fee
schedule, free trial period, etc.
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is very popular in academic world and
in Wall Street too. The core idea of EMH is that market (NASDAQ or New
York Stock Exchange) tend to, and do, achieve instantaneous
efficiency. What EMH preaches is that whatever the market quotes the
stock price is whatever the stock is worth. Therefore, whoever (a
value investor) claims that XYZ stock is under-valued is at odds with
EMH. In EMH world, the latest stock price already reflects all
the information and it is already a fair value and whoever beats the
market is pure out of luck, just like a billion people tossing coin,
there will always be some winner out of billion who beat market and
make money. EMH believers even quote the poor performance of
majority of mutual fund as proof for their theory.
Well, I am not one of those mutual fund managers. For
BlastInvest, EMH is pure nonsense even though EMH is
championed by substantial majority of financial academics. Here is my
view:
- Some markets tend toward instantaneous efficiency, just as EMH
professors are predicting.
- Some markets tend toward efficiency, but slowly.
- Some market are inherently inefficient.
Whether a stock is efficient or not depend on lots of factors, how
liquid is the stock (small cap, low float or not), who the controlling
insiders are and how well they are financed? Where is company is
(foreign vs US ) ? Arbitrage opportunity such as merger
acquisition, etc. It is not an easy answer.
Blast Investor portfolio tend to take advantage of the market
inefficiency by buying inefficient cheap stock and selling efficient
expensive stock. I will take NEN as example for this strategy.
NEN - a gem in real estate
NEN, New England Realty Associate used to have ticker NEWRZ years
ago. It is up a lot year-to-date. Since I first invested into it
in my personal account less than 3 years ago at $28 a share, it is up
2.8 times or more than 44% per year plus 4% - 6% cash payout or close
to 50% per year total return. When I first discovered it 3 years ago,
it was trading at half of its real estate value and its true earning
yield was nearly 20%( earning yield is past year earning divided by its
stock price). It was so irrationally inefficiently cheap simply because
the market did not like it for being a low float small cap stock,
or because it had unfavorable corporate structure of limited
partnership, or because it was somewhat difficult to understand its
business and accounting books.
The inefficient market price of NEN and NEWRZ gave me opportunity and
made me huge profit over past 3 years. As we know now, Real
Estate market has been red hot, especially in Boston and New England
area. The rise or potential rise of interest rate also provides a
favorable business environment for NEN. The NEN insiders have purchased
a lot of NEN shares over past 3 years. From insider point of view, NEN
stock price offered better investment than real-life apartments.
Hypothetically, they could buy up all the outside shares and resale NEN
at higher price with merger to a public REIT or to take NEN to private
and liquidated it if they want cash. Therefore, as long as NEN is
trading significantly below true real estate price, insiders will
continue to buy up all the shares and NEN stock price will continue to
rise. That was exactly what happened over past 3 years. The fact
that current NEN price is at $77.70 compared to $28 three years
ago, proves how inefficient market was when NEWRZ (NEN former
tick) was trading at $28 3 years ago.
From my point of view, making 50% yearly profit return on NEN over past
3 years is not by chance at all. It is perfect example to show how
powerful the long term value investment theory is.
When NEN price goes higher and higher and gradually approaches its
efficient market price, you all should expect more selling from me on
this stock.
WLL - a gem in oil & gas industry.
Since put an alert on WLL for 2nd purchase, WLL has been up a lot. This
is no surprising to me in that WLL was so under-priced just like NEN
did 3 years ago. What I found the inefficiency in Real Estate stock NEN
3 years ago, I found this year in gas and oil stock on WLL. Oil
and natural gas stock is still in early stage of bull market and I
expect more to come in CHK or WLL.
Best wishes to all
subscribers
The Blast Investor Model Portfolio has beaten market significantly
year-to-date. According to EMH, this is pure chance. But I would say
no. Although I can not guarantee my future performance to my
subscribers, I will continue to do my best to find out more gems
like WLL or NEN for all of you. Let's make money together in the coming
days ahead.
Blast
Investor Model
Portfolio Update
(as of 9/15/2004)
Model
Portfolio - Performance
|
|
Portfolio inception date
|
12/31/2003
|
Portfolio inception value
|
$89,000
|
YTD Performance
|
18.80% |
S&P500 Index YTD Performance
|
0.56% |
Model
Portfolio - Open Positions
| Symbol |
Last |
Shrs |
Value |
Paid |
Gain |
| ADGO.OB |
1.10 |
9,000 |
$9,900.00 |
0.78 |
$2,870.00 |
+40.83% |
| CHK |
14.85 |
1,100 |
$16,335.00 |
13.90 |
$1,035.00 |
+6.76% |
| HRB |
47.65 |
350 |
$16,677.50 |
54.00 |
-$2,232.50 |
-11.81% |
| LIBHA.PK |
4.75 |
1,200 |
$5,700.00 |
5.10 |
-$430.00 |
-7.01% |
| NEN |
77.70 |
200 |
$15,540.00 |
54.00 |
$4,730.00 |
+43.76% |
| NRG |
26.19 |
670 |
$17,547.30 |
23.05 |
$2,093.80 |
+13.55% |
| NTES |
38.40 |
350 |
$13,440.00 |
36.60 |
$620.00 |
+4.84% |
| SOHU |
16.35 |
700 |
$11,445.00 |
24.882857 |
-$5,993.00 |
-34.37% |
| WLL |
29.50 |
600 |
$17,700.00 |
22.683333 |
$4,070.00 |
+29.86% |
| $$CASH |
-18,549 |
-$18,549.00 |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
$105,735.80 |
|
|
|
|
Model
Portfolio
Transactions
Date ![[Ascending]](http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/fi/up.gif) |
Type |
Symbol |
Shares |
Price |
Comm |
Amount |
Notes |
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Cash
In |
- |
-
|
-
|
-
|
89,000.00 |
Inception |
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
WRP |
700 |
18.30 |
10.00 |
12,820.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
HCA |
500 |
42.00 |
10.00 |
21,010.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
ADGO.OB |
22,000 |
0.78 |
10.00 |
17,170.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
LIBHA.PK |
1,200 |
5.10 |
10.00 |
6,130.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
SOHU |
500 |
28.60 |
10.00 |
14,310.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
NTES |
350 |
36.60 |
10.00 |
12,820.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
HRB |
350 |
54.00 |
10.00 |
18,910.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
NEN |
300 |
54.00 |
10.00 |
16,210.00 |
-
|
| Dec
31, 2003 |
Buy |
CHK |
1,100 |
13.90 |
10.00 |
15,300.00 |
-
|
| Jan
26, 2004 |
Sell |
WRP |
700 |
17.40 |
10.00 |
12,170.00 |
- 5% |
| Mar
5, 2004 |
Buy |
WLL |
350 |
22.10 |
10.00 |
7,745.00 |
-
|
| May
10, 2004 |
Buy |
SOHU |
200 |
15.59 |
10.00 |
3,128.00 |
-
|
| May
10, 2004 |
Sell |
HCA |
250 |
39.97 |
10.00 |
9,982.50 |
- 4.8% |
| May
24, 2004 |
Sell |
ADGO.OB |
13,000 |
1.55 |
10.00 |
20,140.00 |
+ 98.7% |
| Jun
17, 2004 |
Buy |
NRG |
670 |
23.05 |
10.00 |
15,453.50 |
-
|
| Jun
17, 2004 |
Sell |
HCA |
250 |
40.30 |
10.00 |
10,065.00 |
- 4% |
| Aug
2, 2004 |
Sell |
NEN |
100 |
69.95 |
10.00 |
6,985.00 |
+ 29.5% |
| Aug
5, 2004 |
Buy |
WLL |
250 |
23.50 |
10.00 |
5,885.00 |
-
|